Re: [Freeciv] Re: rfc: autoattack

Thomas Strub <ue80-L38z05uLna+pU24hk/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.games.freeciv.devel,gmane.games.freeciv.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 11:54:17AM -0900, Britton wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Thomas Strub wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 06:39:16PM +0000, Per I. Mathisen wrote:
> > > This should at least make autoattack useful. The question is: Too useful?
> >
> > wow :-)
> >
> > This helps players with slow connections. I like it.
> > Its a big step against clientsidescripting, and would help the AI too.
> >
> > And perhaps it should be configurablei.
> >
> > a = chance to win
> > b = value of attacking unit
> > c = value of attacked unit
> >
> > And if d = a*c/b bigger than a tuned value -> autoattack.
> 
> There's also the question of initiative.  In a situation where a high
> attack/low defense unit moves in next to another such unit, it doesn't
> seem to me that the moving unit should always be the one to get attacked.
> In other words, you should be able to set your moving units to attempt to
> try to autoattack as well, and who gets to attack who should be determined
> in some reasonable way (lots of possibilities: who has more movement or
> which unit could move into neighbors square for least cost, if
> one unit can see further than other, etc.).

No random please. I would say goto works -> unit which is moving will
attack. Otherwise the defending unit has the chance to attack.

Thomas
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.