Re: Cannons attacking ships?

Gregory Berkolaiko <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.games.freeciv.general
Message-ID <Pine.LNX.4.44.0305012137510.13842-100000@pascal.maths.strath.ac.uk>
On Thu, 1 May 2003, Britton wrote:

> 
> On Thu, 1 May 2003, Gregory Berkolaiko wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 30 Apr 2003, Ross Wetmore wrote:
> >
> > > I think you got it backwards ...
> > >
> > > Historically land based cannons were almost useless against ships unless
> > > guarding a narrow waterway like a river. The range is just inadequate.
> > >
> > > Historically ships were always used to blockade ports without fear of
> > > any attack from the land.
> > >
> > > A useful technique would be to let cannon use their *attack* factor
> > > when defending and fortified. When defending, the attacker has come
> > > within range.
> >
> > This would render any attacker useless against a fortified cannon, which
> > is not right.
> 
> It would be different from current game mechanics, but not less realistic.
> The practice of beating down enemy cities from ironclads is the weird idea
> really.  Giving cannons some more defensive fire against ships would make
> invasions require more land units.  Coastal defenses are prohibitively
> expensive for this early on, considering that they have no other use.

So make them cheaper.

G.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.