Re: summary of ranking problems/questions

Thomas Strub <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.games.freeciv.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 02:10:03AM +0200, Horn G?bor wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> I'd like to summarize a bit the problems regarding to the ranking on
> pubserver, and the solutions which i etiher know about or suggest. I
> think the goal is to have a fair and representative ranking system,
> which motivates all players from newbies to tops, and doesn't make them
> turn away from certain type of games. The current system is based on the
> ELO, and a nice one, but it has a few problems:
> 
> 3, Players can use more nicks to cheat their ranking (only use 'primary'
> in games when they're almost sure they'll win, eg againts much weaker
> players). It's forbidden in every 'serious' ranking system afaik, and
> usually means a ban from the system if somebody does this.
[...]
> 
> 3, It's very hard to prevent this, so i think we should aim to make it
> useless. Ranking decay partly does this, but not completely. I think we
> shouldn't provide info about the name of players of the ranking ports'
> pregames. Only the number of them. So if a player join, he can decide if
> he wanna plays or not, but cannot use the playerlist info w/o connecting
> to decide what nick he use in that game. If he leaves and reconnects w/
> the same ip in a few mins, players should recognize it and could tell it
> to the admin. It needs modification of the client/server code i think.
> It's not a 100% protection still, but might be enough againts 90 percent
> of these cheats. If somebody really wants cheat he can, i see no way to
> prevent that. And i think if somebody is cought on cheating, he should
> be deleted from the ranking and banned permanently from the ranking. For
> this doranking script has to be changed to save more detailed data from
> every game, so ranking would be recountable w/o the cheaters points (i
> can do this modification if we agree). I think no serious player would
> risk this.

I don't like that you don't want to give information about the players
who are connected. The time i wanted to get better i connected to ports
where good players were or they joined to a pregame with me.

And deleting a player after you found out that he has found a hole in
the system isn't a good idea too.

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Strub  ***  eMail [email protected]
jb: people are stupid, they don't want to learn.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.