Re: the 'new' city dialog": open discussion

Christian Knoke <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.games.freeciv.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 04:46:41PM -0600, Mike Kaufman wrote:
> I'm wondering if we did a disservice to freeciv by creating the new city
> dialog (the one with with multiple tabs in a notebook).

I don't think so, but I only know GTK 1.2

> I've found that I never open up multiple city dialog windows (on purpose).

I do, managing groups of cities marked in the city report.

> I've found that I've had to switch back and forth multiple times from
> overview to production when creating a worklist.

I will start using worklists when I can assign them from the city report.

> In general I've found that the old dialog was more efficient to use.

The new (GTK 1) dialog allows managing *lots* of units (that happpens), and
CMA. I don't use the other tabs (oh, well, sometimes a look on the happiness
page).

> What are other people's opinion's of this? You might want to compile 
> the XAW client and take a look if you don't remember the old dialog.

Managing lots of cities is still not easy, but better with the new dialog.
It would be easier if there a simpler ways for complex tasks (e.g. city
founding options, macros in the report).

> I've been thinking that perhaps it might be better to open new subdialog 
> windows for production or CMA or happiness from  buttons on the main dialog, 
> and these will remain open and display other city's info as you click on
> other cities... (maybe an option for either the old behavior: new child
> subdialogs for each city dialog open, or new behavior, subdialogs are
> children of the toplevel window and display info (CMA, production, etc) for
> the active city dialog window)

Presenting the information efficiently is a good target, but I don't think
you will achieve this with subwindows. These are horror.

> Did we take a step backward with the new dialog?

No, relax, I really don't think so :)

> Everyone's input, especially non-developers, is welcome.
> 
> -mike

Christian

-- 
Christian Knoke            * * *            http://cknoke.de
* * * * * * * * *  Ceterum censeo Microsoft esse dividendum.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.