RE : : Using DIAMETER_MISSING_AVP for optional AVP
"MORAND Lionel RD-CORE-ISS" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.aaa |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <7DBAFEC6A76F3E42817DF1EBE64CB0260190331D@FTRDMEL2.rd.francetelecom.fr> |
Any other thought on this thread? The initial question was: "Based on the RFC 3588, is it possible to use the DIAMETER_MISSING_AVP result code along with the Failed-AVP AVP to indicate that an optional AVP (from the ABNF point of view) is missing in the received command? If not, could you identify some operational issues?" BR, Lionel