Re: : Diameter SIP app: issue 4
Miguel Garcia <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.aaa |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I have now included the "type of user profile selector" in the draft,
and I have cloed issue 4.
The summary of the changes are:
This version of the draft provides support to identify the type of
user data included in the SIP-User-Data AVP (this can contain a
user profile). The following changes has been made:
* Added a new SIP-Supported-User-Data-Type AVP.
* The old SIP-User-Data AVP is now a grouped AVP that contains
two AVPs: SIP-User-Data-Type and SIP-User-Data-Contents.
* Added a new SIP-User-Data-Type AVP.
* Added a new SIP-User-Data-Contents (that contains the profile).
This is equivalent to the old SIP-User-Data AVP.
* All the above AVPs are visible in SAR, SAA, and PPR commands.
* The new SIP-User-Data and SIP-Supported-User-Data-Type allows
repetition (a server could potential send more than one
profile; a client can express support for more than one type of
profile).
A preliminary working copy version of the draft is available at:
http://people.nokia.net/~miguel/drafts/pre/draft-ietf-aaa-diameter-sip-app-05.txt
or in HTML:
http://people.nokia.net/~miguel/drafts/pre/draft-ietf-aaa-diameter-sip-app-05.html
A diff version with respect version -04 is also available:
http://people.nokia.net/~miguel/drafts/pre/draft-ietf-aaa-diameter-sip-app-04-to-05.html
I will submit version -05 sometime before December 18, and at that time
I will consider the draft ready for IESG submission.
It would be good if you folks can take a look at the working version I
pointed above... If there are comments, I can easily introduce them
before I submit the official version -05.
Regards,
Miguel
Miguel Garcia wrote:
> Inline...
>
> [email protected] wrote:
>
>> Hhhmmmm, why do the Diameter entities need to know what type of
>> profile is being transported?
>
>
> The Diameter entities need not know about the actual profile, but the
> application that is making usage of the profile must know the format of
> this profile.
>
>>
>> Also, so far, in case of 3GPP, there is a different Application-Id, so
>> the profile is implicitely identified.
>
>
> That is not the case in Diameter SIP application. There is a single
> Application ID that is able to transport any kind of user profile form
> the server to the client.
>
> A good protocol design rule is to add negotiation capabilities, so that
> you don't assume thet there is only one type of "thing" (profile in our
> case), but you assume that there are several types, and the client and
> the server have to agree on one type.
>
> I would like to adhere to this kind of design rule.
>
> - Miguel
>
>>
>> br,
>> MCarmen
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Miguel Garcia [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: viernes, 10 de diciembre de 2004 10:50
>> To: MCarmen
>> Cc: AAA mailing list; Maria Carmen Belinchon (ML/EEM); Miguel-Angel
>> Pallares (ML/EEM); Carolina Canales (ML/EEM); Pete McCann; Rajaniemi
>> Jaakko (Nokia-NET/Espoo); Tammi Kalle (Nokia-NET/Tampere)
>> Subject: Re: [AAA-WG]: Diameter SIP app: issue 4
>>
>>
>> 3GPP has defined a profile, so that would be the first one.
>>
>> Others will come in the future, when people start using the Diameter
>> SIP application.
>>
>> So far the assumption is that there is "THE" profile, and the contents
>> are not discussed anywhere. But there is more than "THE" profile.
>>
>> - Miguel
>>
>> MCarmen wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hi Miguel,
>>>
>>> What type of porfiles do you have in mind?
>>> br,
>>> MCarmen
>>>
>>> Miguel Garcia wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi:
>>>>
>>>> I am trying to close open issues in the Diameter SIP application. As
>>>> part of the process, I would like to initiate a discussion on the
>>>> list of those issues for which I would like to get a sense of the
>>>> consensus. Therefore, you will see a few of these posts in the next
>>>> few days.
>>>>
>>>> Reminder:
>>>>
>>>> The list of open issues is stored at:
>>>>
>>>> http://danforsberg.info:8080/draft-ietf-aaa-diameter-sip/
>>>>
>>>> Now, I would like to discuss open issue #4m which is fully described
>>>> at:
>>>> http://danforsberg.info:8080/draft-ietf-aaa-diameter-sip/issue4
>>>>
>>>> So please read it, try to understand it, and comment. My opinion is
>>>> also listed in the open issues tracker, which is, we should provide
>>>> a mechanism to indicate the type of user profile that the client or
>>>> server understand, otherwise there might be incompatibilities. But
>>>> certainly I don't like the IANA registration of this solution.
>>>>
>>>> Comments?
>>>>
>>>> /Miguel
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
--
Miguel A. Garcia tel:+358-50-4804586
Nokia Research Center Helsinki, Finland