RE: : Re: Comments on draft-ietf-aaa-diameter-sip-app-05.txt

<[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.aaa
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Miguel & Cullen,

> I am not sure if this message has been distributed by the AAA mailing 
> list. 

I don't think it was.

> In any case, read below Cullen's concerns and my answers inline.
> 
> Cullen Jennings wrote:
> > I just reviewed the stuff on how MAR/MAA fit in with SIP digest auth - the
> > draft is very nice and complete, and about as exciting as reading MIBs :-)
> > 
> > One trivial comment section 10 second para - the expression "retain
> > authentication of the user" left me puzzled for a bit by what it meant.
> 
> Ok, I see it may be missleading. The idea to express is "if the Diameter 
> server wants to assue that authentication will take place in the own 
> Diameter server (as opposed to a delegated authentication taking place 
> in the SIP server) ...."

I think you mean assume in the second sentence; Cullen, is this text better?

> > It might be worth a comment that on system where the SIP that are using
> > Digest inside of TLS where only the proxy has a certificate, that using the
> > HA1 mode greatly reduces the load on diameter servers. On the other hand
> > this might be obvious to anyone who cares so perhaps it is not worth
> > mentioning. I don't really care much but that's my 0.5 cents.
> 
> It is fine, we can add some motivation text indicating so.

Great; after that, I think we might be done.

John
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.