AW: AW: AW: : digest issue 11 closure (fwd)

Miguel wrote:
> I believe that Jari was trying to say that the gateway will
> need a rule: "the only thing the GW has to know is, what 
> RADIUS attributes must be placed into grouped AVPs".
Ok, now I understand.

> And I believe Jari was oposing to have this rule. But I argued that
> a RADIUS implementation will need rules to translate these
> attributes to SIP, or to Diameter. So the problem remains even
> if we haven't got Diameter into the picture.
I don't think that such a rule would be hard to implement or
resource-intensive.

Wolfgang

--
T-Systems
Next Generation IP Services and Systems
+49 6151 937 2863
Am Kavalleriesand 3
64295 Darmstadt
Germany