Re: : Re: authors 48 hours: RFC 4005 <draft-ietf-aaa-diameter-nasreq-17.txt>

Hello folks,

I have seen recently a case where the document was just
plain _wrong_, even after all the agencies mentioned below
had completed their reviews.  This was in another working
group.  Publication would have been embarrassing in this case.

Mistakes happen.  They shouldn't be compounded by
publication.  Besides which, it's usually a LOT faster
to just fix the problem than to sit around in paralysis mode
while wondering whether anything should be done.

My $0.02.

Regards,
Charlie P.


Bernard Aboba wrote:

>>The error would be in the act of publication, not in Daves's text.
>>    
>>
>
>Since the document is in AUTH48, presumably the WG, IESG, IANA and RFC
>Editor have previously reviewed the document.
>
>At this point we are therefore only looking at potential AUTH48 changes,
>in order to understand whether Dave's suggested text is ok.
>
>  
>