Re: : Re: authors 48 hours: RFC 4005 <draft-ietf-aaa-diameter-nasreq-17.txt>
Jari Arkko <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.aaa |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[email protected] wrote: >Hi, > > > >>The easiest way to deal with translation, though, is to avoid it >>altogether, so the option I much prefer is to extend Dave's I-D >>regarding RADIUS VSAs to the entire RADIUS message and simply >>encapsulate it in a single Diameter AVP in the gateway. >> >> > >Having the Radius-Diameter translation as specified currently >in RFC 3588 and nasreq-draft does not prevent you implementing >this kind of protocol encapsulation. I find the translation >more useful and we should keep it. > > I agree. --Jari