RE: : Re: authors 48 hours: RFC 4005 <draft-ietf-aaa-diameter-nasreq-17.txt>
"Glen Zorn (gwz)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.aaa |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Jari Arkko <mailto:[email protected]> supposedly scribbled: > [email protected] wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> >> >>> The easiest way to deal with translation, though, is to avoid it >>> altogether, so the option I much prefer is to extend Dave's I-D >>> regarding RADIUS VSAs to the entire RADIUS message and simply >>> encapsulate it in a single Diameter AVP in the gateway. >>> >>> >> >> Having the Radius-Diameter translation as specified currently in RFC >> 3588 and nasreq-draft does not prevent you implementing this kind of >> protocol encapsulation. I find the translation more useful and we >> should keep it. >> >> > I agree. That's nice. I prefer Coke over Pepsi; is there perhaps some technical foundation for your preference? > > --Jari Hope this helps, ~gwz Why is it that most of the world's problems can't be solved by simply listening to John Coltrane? -- Henry Gabriel