RE: : RFC 4005 AUTH48 Review

Bernard Aboba <[email protected]> Tue, 10 May 2005 23:45:09 -0700 (PDT)
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.aaa
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> I think your points are valid; revisiting decisions made long ago is
> probably a bad thing at this late date - does anyone want to track
> the time that NASREQ has been under development?

At the risk of shocking myself and others in the WG, I searched
www.watersprings.org.  Here is the earliest document I could come up with:
http://www.watersprings.org/pub/id/draft-calhoun-diameter-nasreq-00.txt

This Internet draft was submitted in December 1999, more than 5 years ago!