RE: : 3588 issue with Vendor-Specific-Application-Id
<[email protected]> Fri, 3 Jun 2005 20:51:37 +0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.aaa |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Avi, I looked over the thread on this, and I don'te quite get your point, could you supply a little more text, esp. on what you reason you think that this should be changed (other than it doesn't make sense)? thanks, John > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of > ext Avi Lior > Sent: 10 May, 2005 18:57 > To: '[email protected]' > Subject: [AAA-WG]: 3588 issue with Vendor-Specific-Application-Id > > > Description of issue > > Submitter name: Avi Lior > Submitter email address: [email protected] > Date first submitted: May 10, 2005 > Reference: > Document: 3%88 > Comment type: T > Priority: S > Section: 6.11 > Rationale/Explanation of issue: > > As the 3588 stands nowm Vendor-Specific-Application-Id AVP is > allowed to > have just a vendor-id element. This does not make any sense. > > Length description of problem > > The ABNF of the Vendor-Specific-Application-Id given below: > > <Vendor-Specific-Application-Id> ::= < AVP Header: 260 > > 1* [ Vendor-Id ] > 0*1{ Auth-Application-Id } > 0*1{ Acct-Application-Id } > > And the following text from 3588 section 6.11: > > "Exactly one of the Auth-Application-Id and > Acct-Application-Id AVPs MAY be > present." > > Allows us to have a Vendor-Specific-Application-Id containing only > Vendor-Id. > > I don't think that that is the intent. > > Requested change: > > To fix this problem, > > Change: > "Exactly one of the Auth-Application-Id and > Acct-Application-Id AVPs MAY be > present." > > To: > "Exactly one of the Auth-Application-Id or > Acct-Application-Id AVPs MUST be > present." > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------ > Avi Lior > Bridgewater Systems Corporation > Phone : (613) 591-9104 x6417 > Cell : (613) 297-2177 > E-mail : mailto:[email protected] > www.bridgewatersystems.com > >