RE: : ISSUE, SIP, authentication parameters

>First I am sorry to say that the time for the 3rd WGLC is 
>over, so we are not ready to make changes during this process. 
>We can do changes during the IETF Last call, if those changes 
>are justified.
>
>With respect your comment. We discussed this issue about 2 
>years ago, and we wanted to add a possibility to enable the 
>scenario described in Sections 5.5 and 5.6, where an outbound 
>proxy is authorizing request. 
>Some users might be authorized to use any SIP method, others 
>only a few of them. In order to do this, the SIP-Method must 
>be present. And at that point in time, the user might not have 
>sent any Authorization header, so the Digest-Method might not 
>be present.
>
>Sorry, but NO.

I think that if there is support for this issue, we could file
it as an IETF Last Call issue.  However, we would need some support
before accepting the issue.

thanks,
John