Re: : The Diameter Maintanence and Extentions WG proposed charter

Hi john,

On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 10:26:03AM +0200, [email protected] wrote:
> Hi Julien & Vidya,
> 
> > FYI, with current mip6 bootstrapping solutions we don't need 
> >to define a new  Diameter Application, just an AVP (to carry 
> >the HA) because we assume  that Diameter NASREQ or EAP is use. (cf.
> > draft-tschofenig-aaa-ha-diameter-01.txt)
> >
> > For FMIP6, we may need to define a new Diameter application 
> >since what  we are doing is AAA for the FMIP6 'application' 
> >and not for network  access.
> 
> For the purposes of the DiME WG proposal, I think I am still lumping 
> MIPv6, FMIPv6 & MIPv6 bootstrapping into one topic.  I think having
> a single AAA document that addresses these points probably would be
> useful.  

 I don't think that we can have one document for all these things. You
 can use Mobile IPv6 without FMIP6. 

> However, as the MIP/FMIP work is still on-going, we can
> address this after there is consensus in the mobility-related WGs
> about what specifically is needed.
> 
> Does this sound reasonable?

 It sounds totally reasonable.

 Julien

> John

-- 
julien.bournelle at int-evry.fr