Re: : The Diameter Maintanence and Extentions WG proposed charter

On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 11:07:21AM +0200, [email protected] wrote:
> Julien,
> 
> >> For the purposes of the DiME WG proposal, I think I am still lumping 
> >> MIPv6, FMIPv6 & MIPv6 bootstrapping into one topic.  I think having a
> 
> >> single AAA document that addresses these points probably would be 
> >> useful.
> >
> > I don't think that we can have one document for all these 
> > things. You  can use Mobile IPv6 without FMIP6. 
> 
> I look at FMIPv6 as an optional extension for MIPv6.  So, if you need
> AAA support for FMIPv6, then you probably will need to also have AAA
> support for MIPv6.  However, if you are looking at only MIPv6, then
> any extensions to support FMIPv6 would be purely optional.

 yes you're right. 
 
  On the other hand, what makes me think that 2 documents could be
  better are the following arguments:

  - FMIP6 is from the mipshop WG whereas MIP6 is from the mip6 WG. 
  - FMIP6 probably requires a new Diameter Application whereas MIP6
    bootstrapping requires only AVPs.

 Julien

> 
> >> However, as the MIP/FMIP work is still on-going, we can address this 
> >> after there is consensus in the mobility-related WGs about what 
> >> specifically is needed.
> >> 
> >> Does this sound reasonable?
> >
> > It sounds totally reasonable.
> 
> Good.
> 
> John

-- 
julien.bournelle at int-evry.fr