AW: : The Diameter Maintanence and Extentions WG proposed charter

hi julien,=20

i share john's view.=20
many aspects are so similar that they could well be covered by a single =
document.=20

ciao
hannes
=20

> -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]=20
> Im Auftrag von [email protected]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 1. Dezember 2005 10:07
> An: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
> Betreff: RE: [AAA-WG]: The Diameter Maintanence and=20
> Extentions WG proposed charter
>=20
> Julien,
>=20
> >> For the purposes of the DiME WG proposal, I think I am=20
> still lumping=20
> >> MIPv6, FMIPv6 & MIPv6 bootstrapping into one topic.  I=20
> think having a
>=20
> >> single AAA document that addresses these points probably would be=20
> >> useful.
> >
> > I don't think that we can have one document for all these=20
> > things. You  can use Mobile IPv6 without FMIP6.=20
>=20
> I look at FMIPv6 as an optional extension for MIPv6.  So, if you need
> AAA support for FMIPv6, then you probably will need to also have AAA
> support for MIPv6.  However, if you are looking at only MIPv6, then
> any extensions to support FMIPv6 would be purely optional.
>=20
> >> However, as the MIP/FMIP work is still on-going, we can=20
> address this=20
> >> after there is consensus in the mobility-related WGs about what=20
> >> specifically is needed.
> >>=20
> >> Does this sound reasonable?
> >
> > It sounds totally reasonable.
>=20
> Good.
>=20
> John
>=20