AW: : RE: Conclusions on the draft "Resource Management Extensions"

Hi all,=20

may I raise your attention to the following draft submitted for this =
meeting.

Requirement for the addition of Auditing Functionality to Diameter
http://psg.com/~avri/dime/draft-bodin-dime-auditing-reqs-00.txt

Unfortunately, it did not yet show up.=20

Ciao
Hannes

> -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]=20
> Im Auftrag von Bernard Aboba
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 21. Juni 2006 16:24
> An: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou)
> Cc: MORAND Lionel RD-CORE-ISS; [email protected]
> Betreff: [AAA-WG]: RE: Conclusions on the draft "Resource=20
> Management Extensions"
>=20
> As Pat said, the major priority of the AAA WG was completing=20
> work on the=20
> Diameter Base protocol and applications.  I actually don't=20
> recall whether=20
> the WG made a judgement on the Resource Management draft; it=20
> just wasn't=20
> one of the top priorities.=20
>=20
> I will say that the Diameter architecture provides a much more sound=20
> base for resource management than RADIUS does.  Most of the resource=20
> management implementations I have seen on RADIUS need to=20
> incorporate other=20
> information sources for validation, in order to deal with=20
> potential losses=20
> of RADIUS Accounting packets.  Since Diameter runs over reliable=20
> transport, it should not have to do this.=20
>=20
> On Wed, 21 Jun 2006, Pat Calhoun (pacalhou) wrote:
>=20
> > I'll let Bernard speak for the WG, but at the time the WG=20
> had many other
> > priorities, and resource management was not one of them. However, I
> > haven't had the opportunity to participate in the AAA WG=20
> for some time,
> > so I'm not sure if this could be an opportune time to=20
> re-introduce it.
> > =20
> >=20
> > Pat Calhoun
> > CTO, Wireless Networking Business Unit
> > Cisco Systems
> >=20
> > =20
> >=20
> >=20
> > ________________________________
> >=20
> > 	From: MORAND Lionel RD-CORE-ISS
> > [mailto:[email protected]]=20
> > 	Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 7:07 AM
> > 	To: Bernard Aboba; Pat Calhoun (pacalhou)
> > 	Subject: Conclusions on the draft "Resource Management
> > Extensions"
> > =09
> > =09
> >=20
> > 	Hi,=20
> > 	I would like to know what were the conclusions on the following
> > draft initiated by Pat: draft-calhoun-diameter-res-mgmt-08.txt.
> >=20
> (http://quimby.gnus.org/internet-drafts/draft-calhoun-diameter
> -res-mgmt-
> > 08.txt
> >=20
> <http://quimby.gnus.org/internet-drafts/draft-calhoun-diameter
> -res-mgmt-
> > 08.txt> )
> >=20
> > 	Some folks from TISPAN are initiating a document based on this
> > draft to perform resource management after failover, proposing to
> > enhance the Diameter base protocol with dedicated commands.=20
> I'm pretty
> > sure that the previous comments/concerns about such enhancements are
> > still valid.
> >=20
> > 	BR,=20
> > 	Lionel=20
> >=20
> >=20
> >=20
>=20