Re: Vector of Profiles MIB

Hi Menachem and Markus,

I think we should have a discussion first about the
scope and purpose of the "Vector of Profiles MIB" proposal.

Can we please address some of the following issues :

1. Would the new MIB cover all xDSL technologies like the
    VDSL2 MIB does ?
2. Would the new MIB cover all the parameters defined in G.997.1 ?
3. Would the only difference between the VDSL2 MIB and the new
    MIB be the way templates are represented ?
4. Can you state the things that the new MIB will have that the VDSL2
    MIB does not have.
5. Can you state the things that the VDSL2 MIB has that the new
    MIB does not have.
6. Is the new MIB intended for embedded use such as in DSLAMs
    and xDSL line cards ?
7. Can you justify having two MIBs that do basically the same thing
    but do it in a slightly different way ?
8. If you are a developer of xDSL equipment, what criterion would you
    use to select one MIB or the other ?


Regards,

Scott.


---- [email protected] wrote: 
> on behalf of Deutsche Telekom, I am interested on that item.
>  
> Thanks
> Markus
>  
> ________________________________
> 
> Von: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Im
> Auftrag von Menachem Dodge
> Gesendet: Montag, 9. November 2009 09:22
> An: Menachem Dodge; '[email protected]'
> Betreff: Re: [Adslmib] Vector of Profiles MIB
> 
> 
> 
> Hello,
> 
>  
> 
> I haven't received any response to my email of last Monday. 
> 
>  
> 
> If anyone at all, has an interest in this item of work, please speak up
> now.
> 
>  
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> Menachem Dodge
> 
>  
> 
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of Menachem Dodge
> Sent: Monday, November 02, 2009 7:07 PM
> To: '[email protected]'
> Subject: Re: [Adslmib] Vector of Profiles MIB
> 
>  
> 
> Hello All,
> 
>  
> 
> In April this year, several emails were exchanged regarding development
> of a "Vector of Profile" MIB in accordance with the Broadband Forum
> TR-165 Vector of Profiles document.
> 
> See the attached thread.
> 
>  
> 
> As this issue has been raised again, I would like to see if there is an
> interest amongst the members of the Working Group in this work.
> 
>  
> 
> Please share your thoughts on this issue.
> 
>  
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> Menachem
>