RE: Issue with HCTC Perf Interval MIB (and therefore wi th the VDSL MIB)

"Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.adslmib
Message-ID <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B15502FB8828@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com>
Thanks, I will pick it up from there when I see it appear
in the repository.

Bert 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bob Ray [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: maandag 24 november 2003 16:30
> To: Mike Sneed
> Cc: adslmib mail list
> Subject: Re: [Adslmib] Issue with HCTC Perf Interval MIB (and 
> therefore
> with the VDSL MIB)
> 
> 
> On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 11:06, Michael Sneed wrote:
> > During the IETF Last Call process there were some concerns 
> expressed in the 
> > IESG about the HCTC Performance Interval MIB 
> > (draft-ietf-adslmib-hc-tc-06.txt) that we have recommended 
> to go to Proposed 
> > Standard.  In a nutshell, the problem is one of alignment 
> of the various 
> > MIBs that deal with this topic (namely RFC3593 and 2856).
> > 
> > As a result of this discussion, it has been recommended 
> that we change
> > 
> >     - HCPerfTimeElapsed, Gauge32 (0...86399)
> >     - HCPerfValidIntervals, Gauge32 (0...96)
> >     - HCPerfInvalidIntervals, Gauge32 (0...96)
> > 
> > to type Integer32.
> 
> draft-ietf-adslmib-hc-tc-07.txt has been submitted with the above
> changes.
> 
> -- 
> Bob Ray <[email protected]>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Adslmib mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/adslmib
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.