RE: Issue with HCTC Perf Interval MIB (and therefore wi th the VDSL MIB)
"Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.adslmib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B15502FB8828@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com> |
Thanks, I will pick it up from there when I see it appear in the repository. Bert > -----Original Message----- > From: Bob Ray [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: maandag 24 november 2003 16:30 > To: Mike Sneed > Cc: adslmib mail list > Subject: Re: [Adslmib] Issue with HCTC Perf Interval MIB (and > therefore > with the VDSL MIB) > > > On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 11:06, Michael Sneed wrote: > > During the IETF Last Call process there were some concerns > expressed in the > > IESG about the HCTC Performance Interval MIB > > (draft-ietf-adslmib-hc-tc-06.txt) that we have recommended > to go to Proposed > > Standard. In a nutshell, the problem is one of alignment > of the various > > MIBs that deal with this topic (namely RFC3593 and 2856). > > > > As a result of this discussion, it has been recommended > that we change > > > > - HCPerfTimeElapsed, Gauge32 (0...86399) > > - HCPerfValidIntervals, Gauge32 (0...96) > > - HCPerfInvalidIntervals, Gauge32 (0...96) > > > > to type Integer32. > > draft-ietf-adslmib-hc-tc-07.txt has been submitted with the above > changes. > > -- > Bob Ray <[email protected]> > > > _______________________________________________ > Adslmib mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/adslmib >