Re: RFC3276 interpretation - line rate in 4-wire mode

On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 14:04, Clay Sikes wrote:
> Bob Ray,
> 
> On 09, Oct 2003, I asked about modifications to RFC 3276 in support for 
> G.shdsl.bis. If you are going to open up this MIB for modifications, 
> please, please consider support for G.shdsl.bis. The following is a copy 
> of the 09, Oct 2003 email. I think some things that were provisional 
> when I send the original email have now been decided.
> 
> I think the issues are with line rates which it looks like you are going 
> to address and with the addition of a third and fourth wire pair.
> 

Clay (and others):

I have been, unfortunately, OUT of the telecommunications industry
for over two years.  In many ways, I'm just glad to be employed (as
being unemployed is NOT FUN).  

I have no official status in the IETF other than guy-who-wrote-a-draft. 
You, too, can be a "guy-who-wrote-a-draft".  Or two.  Or three. :)

If you see changes that need to be made because of g.shdsl.bis, I 
would encourage you to "take up the banner" and submit a draft/revision,
then pester the various working groups, technical advisers, chairs,
committees, and industry/trade groups to see it through. 

Bob Ray

> _______________________________________________
> Adslmib mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/adslmib