Re: MIBs for ITU-T G.Bond and T1E1 M2DSL projects

On Tue, 2004-03-02 at 11:54, Edward Beili wrote:
> Dear members of ADSLMIB group,
> 
> I would like to start working on the MIBs for the ITU-T G.Bond
> and T1E1 M2DSL projects (please read my original letter at the
> bottom of this mail for a short description of these projects).
>  
> Dan Romascanu has suggested your working group as the most 
> fitting to host such MIBs. I would appreciate your opinion on 
> that matter. At the very least please indicate if you would be
> interested to participate in the work on those MIBs. 
>  
> Regards,
> -Edward Beili
> Actelis Networks
>  

FWIW, I agree.  I keep looking at g.shdsl.bis and it is obvious
what is going on; very much related.  

	2 wires -> 4 wires -> 8 wires -> ????

I wonder if, instead of having three mibs, you/we instead devise 
a generic mapping scheme; a level of indirection.  Do you have an
initial feel if such an approach would work?  Does something based
upon the ifStack approach work here?

Bob Ray