coments on draft G.SHDSL.BIS MIB
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.adslmib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <OF7CE53E9A.2089B8DE-ON86256E74.004ED182-86256E74.005051EE@verilink.com> |
Thank you Clay for taking on the editorship of G.SHDSL.BIS.
My comments are below.
Reference this paragraph:
> 2.3.2. Changes to Line Rate Objects
>
> Four objects in the HDSL2/SHDSL Line MIB have rate limitations.
> In each case, these objects have the syntax
>
> SYNTAX Unsigned32(0..4112000)
>
> Changes introduced in G.SHDSL.bis support an increased upper rate
> of 5696 kbits/s, leading to the updated syntax
>
> SYNTAX Unsigned32(0..5696000).
Comments:
I think the original RFC3276 was incorrect with respect to the maximum line
rate for 2 pairs.
A single G.SHDSL pair may have a line rate up to 2312000 bps. With two
pairs, doubling that amount
would be 4624000. I think RFC3276 incorrectly doubled the value of
(2048000 + 8000) to get 4112000.
Now, with 4 wire pairs, it seems correct to have 2312000 * 4, or 9248000
as the maximum line rate.
Am I missing something ? Is there something I don't understand about the
5696000 number ?
I also think the defaults should follow G.SHDSL instead of HDSL2.
The default for hdsl2ShdslSpanConfMinLineRate would be 200000 (192000 +
8000).
And the default for hdsl2ShdslSpanConfMaxLineRate would be 2312000.
Also, I think a status parameter with the data rate or effective bandwidth
of the span would
be useful. The maximum data rate would be (2312000 - 8000) * 4, or
9216000.
hdsl2ShdslStatusActualDataRate OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Unsigned32(0..9216000)
UNITS "bps"
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"Contains the actual data rate for this HDSL2/SHDSL span. "
::= { hdsl2ShdslSpanStatusEntry xxx }
Comments ?
Lee Nipper
Verilink Corporation