Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-adslmib-gshdslbis-06.txt
"Randy Presuhn" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.adslmib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <008f01c4ab20$db1053c0$7f1afea9@oemcomputer> |
Hi - > From: <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Cc: <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 12:28 PM > Subject: [Adslmib] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-adslmib-gshdslbis-06.txt ... A few comments on the references in the udpated draft - --- What is RFC 32766? (page 16) --- [RFC3410] Case, J., Mindy, R., Partain, D. and B. Stewart, "Introduction and Applicability Statements for Internet Standard Management Framework", RFC 3416, December 2002. The 3416 should be 3410. --- BCP 78 and BCP 79 (3667 and 3668) are cited in the IPR stuff, but do not appear in the references. Does anyone know what the current policy is for these? --- References to RFC 3276 appear in the DESCRIPTION portions of numerous OBJECT clauses, specifying what the required-to support ranges are. This sounds normative to me. --- The PerfHist-TC-MIB from RFC 3593 is IMPORTed. Consequently, this needs to be a normative reference. --- Randy