Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-adslmib-gshdslbis-06.txt

Hi -

> From: "Clay Sikes" <[email protected]>
> To: "Randy Presuhn" <[email protected]>
> Cc: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 12:57 PM
> Subject: Re: [Adslmib] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-adslmib-gshdslbis-06.txt
...
> I have made corrections to all the issues but one.  The one I haven't
> done is the third issue regarding references to BCP 78 / RFC 3667 and
> BCP 79 / RFC 3668.  I looked at the last six new RFCs and didn't see
> them in any of the references section.

I *think* that's the correct thing to do, but don't recall what document explains
why BCP 78 & 79 get special treatment in references.  That's the reason
for my question.

> I'll upload version -07 tomorrow morning unless I hear otherwise.  My
> assumption is that the references are not needed.  Please let me know if
> my assumption is incorrect.
...

Sounds good to me.

Randy