RE: ADSL2+ 02 draft
"Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.adslmib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B155083CEC7E@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com> |
Inline > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On > Behalf Of Ray, Robert > Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 17:04 > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Adslmib] ADSL2+ 02 draft > > > All: > > A reminder and request: > > -02 has been posted. > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-adslmib-adsl2-02.txt > > Please review this draft - we would like to proceed towards > WG last call if possible. > > I believe the authors have addressed all elements of the previous round. > The authors have decided to keep the TCs in the draft (versus breaking > them out into another document). > Sorry for not having reacted on this earlier. There is also the possibility to have a separate MIB module for TCs but have it specified within the same I-D (and later RFC). It does nicely separate out the TCs, keeps them close to the MIB module that is using them, and yet allows to separate it out in a different doc in the future if we ever need to. Bert > Regards, > Bob Ray > > _______________________________________________ > Adslmib mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/adslmib >