RFC3728 : vdslPerfDataTable

"Ambiga Karthikeyan" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.adslmib
Message-ID <9025E129D3FCD340A7BA67E342D10E7A0E1513CB@ms06>
Dear RFC Editors,

 

In vdslPerDataTable I see the following mib variables

 

     VdslPerfDataEntry ::=

     SEQUENCE

         {

         vdslPerfDataValidIntervals         HCPerfValidIntervals,

         vdslPerfDataInvalidIntervals       HCPerfInvalidIntervals,

            ...

          vdslPerfData1DayValidIntervals     HCPerfValidIntervals,

          vdslPerfData1DayInvalidIntervals   HCPerfInvalidIntervals,

            ...

            }

>From RFC3705 definition of HCPerfValidIntervals, I see that it can take
value 0-96 (number of 15 min interval in 1 day).

 

I understand vdslPerfDataValidIntervals  ,
vdslPerfDataInvalidIntervals  means the total number of valid/invalid
intervals since the last reset. So we can have value > 96 and so
shouldn't it be defined as Unsigned32 ? Only
vdslPerfData1DayValidIntervals and vdslPerfData1DayInvalidIntervals will
be limited by 0..96 . 

 

Thank you very much,

Ambiga

_______________________________________________
Adslmib mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/adslmib
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.