Re: shdsl MIB
"Clay Sikes" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.adslmib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Artem, I hope that you are referring to the MIB module defined in RFC 3276. This RFC has been obsoleted by RFC 4319 which increases the rates to 4,294,967,295 bps which should be enough to support the 5,696,000 bps rate in Annex F. I'm not aware of any lack of Annex F support in RFC 4319. Best Regards, Clay Sikes On 3/6/2006 1:31 AM, Polyakov Artem wrote: >Hello, sorry for my english. >I am interest in SHDSL MIB. >The question is: why this MIB don't support ANNEX F mode? >Best regards, Artem ( Sigrand LLC ) > > > > >_______________________________________________ >Adslmib mailing list >[email protected] >https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/adslmib > > -- Paradyne Mail --