RE: Fw: Liaison from the DSLF

Hi All,

In my opinion WT-129 should model xDSL Bonding (G.998.1, G.998.2,
Ethernet and ATM level). I can understand the need to discriminate line
level parameters from protocol level parameters. Maybe we can define the
modelling xDSL bonding in a separate section of the WT-129. 

On similar lines, I see that the ATM level and Ethernet level bonding is
not modelled in any of the MIBs of the adslmib WG. Again, the current
drafts might not be the best place to define it. I propose to have
another draft for xDSL bonding.

Regards
Naren

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2006 3:59 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: [Adslmib] Fw: Liaison from the DSLF

Hi All,

      Please find the DSL Forum Liaison letter and WT-129 attached.

      The DSL Forum document, WT-129,  serves as a guide for our work in
developing the VDSL2 MIB so please review the document
carefully.
      Should there be any comments/feedback please voice these on our WG
mailing list so that I can send a formal response to the
DSL Forum. You will notice that the document will be going to
straw-ballot
in September.


Best Regards,
Menachem

----- Forwarded by Menachem Dodge/ECI Telecom on 16/07/2006 13:18 -----
 

             "Peter Adams"

             <p.f.adams@btopen

             world.com>
To 
                                       <[email protected]>

             15/07/2006 00:47
cc 
 

 
Subject 
                                       Liaison from the DSLF

 

 

 

 

 

 





Dear Menachem,

At the last meeting of the DSLF it was decided to liaise to you the
straw
ballot copy of WT-129 when it was ready.  I have just completed changes
agreed at the meeting and so attached to this e-mail are the liaison
letter
from the DSLF and WT-129.

Regards,

Peter Adams

Operations and Network Management WG Chair
DSL Forum

 (See attached file: IETF liaison.doc)(See attached file:
WT-129v3.0.doc)