RE: VDSL2 draft draft-ietf-adslmib-vdsl2-01.txt

<[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.adslmib
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hello All,

 

As Naren (mail dated Thu, 27 Jul 2006 15:54:45 +0530 ) was suggesting WG
should produce an Internet draft which addresses Bonding standards
(ITU-T G.998.1, ITU-T G.998.2, ITU-T G.998.3).Currently WG group has
produced RFCs on ADSL,SHDL,VDSL flavors. But I see none on the bonding
standards. Yes as Menachem suggests it should not be part of VDSL MIB
,but a separate Internet draft .

 

Regards,

Veena.

 

________________________________

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Monday, August 21, 2006 1:57 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Adslmib] VDSL2 draft draft-ietf-adslmib-vdsl2-01.txt

 

Menachem,
The bonding should not be addressed within the VDSL2 MIB. The ITU-T
G.998.2 Ethernet bonding standard aplies to SHDSL, ADSL(2)(plus) and
VDSL2. It should be addressed separately, as management of a bonding
layer on top of the physical layer, hence on top of the VDSL2 MIB, and
not as part of it.
Regards,
Frank


[email protected] wrote:




Hi, 

        The VDSL2 draft draft-ietf-adslmib-vdsl2-01.txt was posted two
weeks ago. 

        I hope that everyone is reviewing this document. 


        There has been no response regarding the xDSL Bonding issue
raised two weeks ago. Does this imply no interest? 
Editors? Anyone? 


Best Regards, 
Menachem.



 



________________________________



 
_______________________________________________
Adslmib mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/adslmib

_______________________________________________
Adslmib mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/adslmib
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.