Clay,
I did go through the hubmib EFM draft, looking at it from bonding
perspective.
- The draft-ietf-hubmib-efm-cu-mib-05 is based on IEEE 802.3ah-2004 (not
on G.998.2).
- ITU-T G.998.2 refers to the IEEE standard for most part; but it
generalizes the Ethernet bonding to all xDSL technologies.
- ITU-T G.998.2 doesn't restrict Ethernet bonding to SHDSL and VDSL
alone (which IEEE 802.3ah-2004 does).
My views are:
a) We should have a separate MIB for xDSL bonding
b) Generalize as far as possible taking both G.998.1 and G.998.2
into account
Regards
Naren
________________________________
From: Clay Sikes [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, August 21, 2006 7:42 PM
To: Narendranath Nair (WT01 - Broadband Networks);
[email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Adslmib] VDSL2 draft draft-ietf-adslmib-vdsl2-01.txt
Hi,
I thought that G.998.1 is commonly used to bond ADSL while G.998.2 via
IEEE 802.3ah is commonly used to bond SHDSL and VDSL.
Naren, have you looked at the draft-ietf-hubmib-efm-cu-mib-05 for
G.998.2/IEEE 802.ah?
It does seem like there needs to be a MIB for G.998.1.
Regards,
Clay
On 8/21/2006 6:15 AM, [email protected] wrote:
Frank,
Shouldn't we take into consideration ITU-T G.998.1 also, and have one
common model for both ATM and Ethernet bonding?
Regards
Naren
________________________________
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, August 21, 2006 1:57 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Adslmib] VDSL2 draft draft-ietf-adslmib-vdsl2-01.txt
Menachem,
The bonding should not be addressed within the VDSL2 MIB. The ITU-T
G.998.2 Ethernet bonding standard aplies to SHDSL, ADSL(2)(plus) and
VDSL2. It should be addressed separately, as management of a bonding
layer on top of the physical layer, hence on top of the VDSL2 MIB, and
not as part of it.
Regards,
Frank
[email protected] wrote:
Hi,
The VDSL2 draft draft-ietf-adslmib-vdsl2-01.txt was posted two
weeks ago.
I hope that everyone is reviewing this document.
There has been no response regarding the xDSL Bonding issue
raised two weeks ago. Does this imply no interest?
Editors? Anyone?
Best Regards,
Menachem.
________________________________
_______________________________________________
Adslmib mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/adslmib
________________________________
_______________________________________________
Adslmib mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/adslmib
_______________________________________________
Adslmib mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/adslmib
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.