Re: draft-ietf-adslmib-gbond-mib-00.txt
Uri Shabi <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.adslmib |
|---|---|
| Organization | RAD Data Communications LTD |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Eduard hi, Regarding the overlap I refer to the bonding capability. The GBOND-ETH-MIB of course handle this and the EFM-CU-MIB also includes the PCS which is the aggregation layer. The ITU is a copy of the IEEE with some extension. Why do we need both? Uri. Edward Beili wrote: > Uri, > 1. You are right, current definition of ifSpeed is only correct for the Ethernet service. I'll correct it in the next revision. > > 2. EFM-CU-MIB covers management of 2BASE-TL (G.SHDSL based) and 10PASS-TS (VDSL based) defined in IEEE 802.3ah, including both physical layer and bonding. The WG Last Call was just sent for this MIB. ITU-T 998.2 takes the bonding as defined in 802.3ah but allows it to be used on any xDSL technology. Therefore GBOND-MIB and GBOND-ETH-MIB would cover just the bonding management, leaving physical layer management to corresponding xDSL LINE MIBs. > > 3. WT-157 can be downloaded from the DSL Forum website (restricted to the forum members only). Note that this is work in progress, don't expect it to be complete. > > Menachem, is there an area on the workgroup site where I can put this document for group download? > > Regards, > -E. > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Uri Shabi [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 17:45 >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: [Adslmib] draft-ietf-adslmib-gbond-mib-00.txt >> >> Hi all, >> I was not involved in your MIB process until now and would >> like to give my comments, >> >> 1. para 4.1.5 ifSpeed section reads the following: >> "For the GBS it is the sum of the current operating data >> rates of all BCEs in the aggregation group, without the >> encapsulation overhead and G.Bond overhead, but accounting >> for the Inter-Frame Gaps (IFG)" >> As I understand the IFG refers to Ethernet medium but the GBS of type >> g9981&3 are not Ethernet. >> >> 2. Looking at the G.998.2 and 802.3ah EFM bonding, these are >> almost the same thing. AS I understand on the MIB progress, >> there are the EFM-Cu and the GBOND-ETH, why to do two MIBs >> and not keep with a single one? >> >> 3. Where can I get WT-157? >> >> Appreciate your comments, Uri. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Adslmib mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/adslmib >> >>