Re: AD review of draft-ietf-adslmib-vdsl2-06.txt
"David B Harrington" <[email protected]> Sun, 9 Nov 2008 10:11:12 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.adslmib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Moti Morgenstern [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2008 9:53 AM > To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); David B Harrington > Cc: MIB Doctors (E-mail); [email protected]; Menachem Dodge; > [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: RE: AD review of draft-ietf-adslmib-vdsl2-06.txt > > Comment T1 > -------------- > Comment suggests writing specifically in the MIB module, in > the DESCRIPTION clauses of the MIB tables, what is the > persistence policy relative to the objects in the table. > Response: We have a section in the document called "2.5. > Persistence" which lists all persistent objects. If you > search for each of these objects in the MIB, not all of the > objects mention persistence in the DESCRIPTION clause. On eproblem with this approach is that MIb modules ar efrequently distributed without the surrounding text. An operator who has only the MIB module itself, withut all the surroundign document will not have this information. If you are going to put important information in only on eplace, it should be in the MIB module itself. dbh