I-D Action: draft-reilly-sentinel-protocol-02.txt

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.announce
Message-ID <178761129938.459624.4961185332188013099@dt-datatracker-786f84c586-97d96>
Internet-Draft draft-reilly-sentinel-protocol-02.txt is now available.

   Title:   Reilly Sentinel Protocol (RSP): Blockchain-Anchored Integrity for AI Datasets, Training, Fine-Tuning, and Inference Provenance
   Author:  Lawrence John Reilly Jr.
   Name:    draft-reilly-sentinel-protocol-02.txt
   Pages:   44
   Dates:   2026-08-24

Abstract:

   The Reilly Sentinel Protocol (RSP) specifies an interoperable,
   multi-layer method for establishing integrity, provenance, and
   auditability across the artificial intelligence (AI) lifecycle.
   RSP defines a Sentinel Evidence Package (SEP) that binds payload
   digests, provenance metadata, signatures, blockchain timestamp
   proofs, and resolvable identifiers.  This enables tamper-evident,
   independently verifiable receipts for datasets, data
   transformations, training jobs, checkpoints, fine-tuning runs,
   evaluations, inference outputs, and agentic AI action logs.

   This revision (-02) supersedes draft-reilly-sentinel-protocol-01
   and corrects defects in it.  The cross-chain binding hash of -01
   was computed under SHA3-512 alone over an unframed concatenation
   of hex strings, which made a single algorithm the point of failure
   for a construction whose stated purpose was to survive the failure
   of any single algorithm, and which admitted field-boundary
   ambiguity.  It is replaced by an entangled link construction over
   a fixed-length framed input, with a concatenated braid that
   privileges no algorithm.  The post-quantum analysis of -01 applied
   Grover's algorithm to collision resistance, a property Grover does
   not meaningfully reduce, and stated SHA-256's collision resistance
   as 256 bits when it is 128 bits classically.  The claim that
   combining three hash functions requires an adversary to break all
   three is replaced, following [JOUX], by a hedging claim.  Merkle
   tree construction, left unspecified in -01 while relied upon by
   three separate extensions, is now normatively specified per
   [RFC6962].  Digest-only selective disclosure is replaced by salted
   commitments.  Automated repair of chain integrity violations is
   prohibited.

   RSP is transport-agnostic and serializable in JSON and CBOR.  It
   leverages existing IETF building blocks including COSE signatures,
   CBOR, CDDL, JSON, and NTS-secured time.  Anchoring is done via
   append-only blockchain receipts and identity is stabilized with
   persistent identifiers.

The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-reilly-sentinel-protocol/

There is also an HTMLized version available at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-reilly-sentinel-protocol-02

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-reilly-sentinel-protocol-02

Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at:
rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts


_______________________________________________
I-D-Announce mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.