I-D Action: draft-dogru-cedulon-reattestation-00.txt

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.announce
Message-ID <178767519788.623745.14837481536082174955@dt-datatracker-786f84c586-97d96>
Internet-Draft draft-dogru-cedulon-reattestation-00.txt is now available.

   Title:   Cedulon Re-Attestation: Carrying Spend Evidence Across Algorithm Retirement
   Author:  Emek Can Dogru
   Name:    draft-dogru-cedulon-reattestation-00.txt
   Pages:   6
   Dates:   2026-08-25

Abstract:

   Audit evidence is only useful for as long as it can be verified.
   Cedulon produces COSE spend receipts and epoch checkpoints whose
   signature algorithms will eventually be deprecated or broken; the
   recent transition from polymorphic EdDSA to fully-specified Ed25519
   algorithm identifiers shows that even identifiers change within a
   decade.  This document proposes a re-attestation profile for Cedulon
   evidence: a signed statement, produced while the original algorithm
   is still trustworthy, that binds the original evidence bytes to a
   successor algorithm and is registered in a SCITT transparency
   service.  Chains of such statements allow a verifier decades later to
   trust evidence whose original cipher has been retired.  Structures
   are meant to outlive ciphers.  This is an extension proposal to the
   Cedulon core document; its normative language is provisional and the
   companion implementation does not implement it yet.

The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dogru-cedulon-reattestation/

There is also an HTML version available at:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-dogru-cedulon-reattestation-00.html

Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at:
rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts


_______________________________________________
I-D-Announce mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.