I-D Action: draft-dogru-cedulon-04.txt

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.announce
Message-ID <178808275316.205253.6618901036963812538@dt-datatracker-6669c7b496-s9mrn>
Internet-Draft draft-dogru-cedulon-04.txt is now available.

   Title:   Cedulon: An Audit Layer for Agent-to-Agent Commerce
   Author:  Emek Can Dogru
   Name:    draft-dogru-cedulon-04.txt
   Pages:   72
   Dates:   2026-08-30

Abstract:

   This document defines the Cedulon Protocol, an audit layer for agent-
   to-agent commerce.  Payment rails such as HTTP 402 flows (x402) and
   mandate protocols (AP2) already move value.  They do not, by
   themselves, produce a fail-closed policy check and a signed spend
   receipt that a verifier can reconcile against a rail extract.
   Cedulon specifies a Trade Manifest (signed offer before payment), a
   Policy Decision Point with default deny, a Spend Receipt (COSE/CWT
   claim set after a gated payment), epoch checkpoints, and rail-extract
   reconciliation.  The reconciliation shows that no settlement on the
   extract lacks a receipt and no settled receipt is absent from the
   extract.  That result is unconditional only when the verifier pins
   the rail key out of band and states the period under audit; otherwise
   the document requires it to be reported as conditional.  Checkpoints
   carry the suppression guarantee, so the document profiles the
   checkpoint as a Signed Statement, gives the verification algorithm a
   step that consumes the transparency receipts returned for
   checkpoints, names what a witness holding a checkpoint the presented
   chain omits reports, brings equivocation within reach by comparing
   recorded copies against the presented chain, and states how
   checkpoint totals may be withheld without withholding the fact that
   they were.  No signed object may be verified against a key it carries
   itself, and a presented Trade Manifest must be bound both to the
   receipts that name it and to the terms those receipts claim.  The
   document also names a threat no adversary causes, a settlement
   recorded on a rail with no receipt behind it, and defines a Dispute
   Evidence Bundle (evidence, not an award) and optional SCITT
   anchoring.  This revision defines the encodings earlier revisions
   called canonical without defining them, and states the exact input to
   every hash-valued field, so that an independent verifier can be
   written from the text alone.  Cedulon is not a competitor to x402 or
   AP2; it sits above them.

The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dogru-cedulon/

There is also an HTML version available at:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-dogru-cedulon-04.html

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-dogru-cedulon-04

Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at:
rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts


_______________________________________________
I-D-Announce mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.