r.e. tls/ssl negotiation

Are you asking for TLS to do more negotiation or for SSL3 to do more
negotiation?

At 07:02 PM 5/6/97 -0700, you wrote:
>On Tue, 6 May 1997, Dennis Glatting wrote:
>> It may be worthwhile to note the potential impact of a MIM
>> altering the TLS keyword parameters, e.g., nuke "TLS.10" and
>> "SSL3.0" in lieu of "SSL2.0", or nuke the TLS keyword
>> altogether.
>
>Given that anything implementing STARTTLS is "new", why support SSL2.0
>at all?
>
>Is there a real need to negotiate the difference between SSL3.0 and TLS?
>
>It's kinda annoying the SSL folks apparently didn't figure out how to
>negotiate protocol extension stuff within the SSL/TLS protocol itself.
>
>
>
>
>