Re: Serious design flaw in STARTLS documents
Paul Hoffman / IMC <[email protected]> Tue, 21 Apr 1998 18:25:28 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.apps-tls |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This all seems fine to me, except. >A server MUST NOT return the STARTTLS extension in response >to an EHLO command received after a TLS handshake has completed. (That's the "TLS" extension, by the way...) I would add before that: ===== Both the client and the server must know if there is a TLS session active. A client MUST NOT attempt to start a TLS session if a TLS session is already active. ===== That is, even if the server doesn't say TLS, the client might issue a STARTTLS command. This covers both sides of the attempt to do TLS over TLS. --Paul Hoffman, Director --Internet Mail Consortium