Re: Servers that just want to have TLS
Chris Newman <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.apps-tls |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 8 May 1997, Paul E. Hoffman wrote: > And, I still want a general model for application protocols where the > client talks first. First we need to realize that SMTP is a special case since it's an unauthenticated protocol by default. Second, there's a more general problem of indicate that a higher security level is required. For application protocols, the right thing to do is say NO to LOGIN/AUTHENTICATE commands until the right level of security is achieved for the desired user. With IMAP, you'd get: A001 NO [ENCRYPT-REQUIRED] Access not permitted without encryption or A001 NO [INTEGRITY-REQUIRED] Access not permitted without integrity protection then you know STARTTLS or an equivalent SASL mechanism is needed.