Re: Servers that just want to have TLS
Jeff Williams <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.apps-tls |
|---|---|
| Organization | IEG. INC. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Chris, I think you are absolutely correct here. Well put! Chris Newman wrote: > > On Thu, 8 May 1997, Paul E. Hoffman wrote: > > And, I still want a general model for application protocols where the > > client talks first. > > First we need to realize that SMTP is a special case since it's an > unauthenticated protocol by default. > > Second, there's a more general problem of indicate that a higher security > level is required. > > For application protocols, the right thing to do is say NO to > LOGIN/AUTHENTICATE commands until the right level of security is achieved > for the desired user. > > With IMAP, you'd get: > > A001 NO [ENCRYPT-REQUIRED] Access not permitted without encryption > > or > > A001 NO [INTEGRITY-REQUIRED] Access not permitted without integrity > protection > > then you know STARTTLS or an equivalent SASL mechanism is needed. Regards, -- Jeffrey A. Williams DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java Development Eng. Information Eng. Group. Phone :913-294-2375 (v- office) E-Mail [email protected]