Re: draft-hoffman-rfc2487bis-03.txt
Paul Hoffman / IMC <[email protected]> Tue, 29 Aug 2000 10:26:23 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.apps-tls |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <p05000e4fb5d1a24360ec@[165.227.249.17]> |
At 10:28 AM +0200 8/29/00, Bodo Moeller wrote: >If, after having issued the STARTTLS command, the client finds out >that some failure prevents it from actually starting a TLS handshake, >then it should just abort the connection. I'm OK with this if everyone else is. It feels weird to me on a protocol level, but I'm not an implementor. More opinions are welcome. >I think the specification should state that servers MUST be able >to understand backwards compatible Client Hello messages (provided >that client_version is TLS 1.0 or later), and that clients MAY >use backwards compatbile Client Hellos messages. Of course neither >clients or servers can be required to actually offer the full >protocols because the specification is just about TLS. Sounds OK to me. Other voices? --Paul Hoffman, Director --Internet Mail Consortium