Re: rfc2487bis-04: Failed negotiations & virtual hosting
Paul Hoffman / IMC <[email protected]> Fri, 27 Oct 2000 15:19:55 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.apps-tls |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <p0501041ab61fafe99590@[165.227.249.17]> |
At 2:44 PM -0700 10/27/00, Chris Newman wrote: >--On Tuesday, October 17, 2000 11:01 +0200 Lutz Jaenicke ><[email protected]> wrote: >>An "easy" way to do it would be to >>extend STARTTLS to "STARTTLS required_target", but this would in fact >>change the protocol. > >I'd be amenable to a "MULTIDOMAIN" EHLO keyword, with the following meaning: > >(1) If STARTTLS is also advertised, a domain name SHOULD be supplied >as an argument to the STARTTLS command. >(2) If AUTH is also advertised, then usernames of the form >"user@domain" are supported and recommended for authentication. >(3) If neither STARTTLS nor AUTH is advertised, the keyword is ignored. Just a note that this would also change the protocol, but only for servers who understand MULTIDOMAIN. --Paul Hoffman, Director --Internet Mail Consortium