Re: To email or not to email...
Suresh Ramasubramanian <[email protected]> Sat, 23 Oct 2004 13:35:52 +0530
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.asrg.abuserep |
|---|---|
| Organization | -ENOENT |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Bruce Brown wrote: > Agreed, and a number of AA solutions block the SMTP at the connect, long > before a MailFrom or RcptTo ever shows up, others block it before it even > gets to the MTA, by programming the firewall or load balancer to not even > pass the TCP connect through. In all of these cases, the result is the same, > the abuser can't report abuse via the normal SMTP mechanisms using the Mx > record. In which case the abuser should feel free to use a different address, on a different server .. alternatively, a web form can be provided on the site that provides an alternate method of contact (for example, take a look at http://spamblock.outblaze.com/61.10.209.175 Or quite often, the affected admin, given that I've seen too many cases where people who shoud know to read headers far better, but who still manage to snag jobs as mail admins / postmasters at large ISPs - even tier 1s, go around blocking our network, and our 40 million users ... and then ignore email to their postmaster address anyway, after you report it. It would be an excellent thing if MAAWG events had workshops on just how to manage an abuse desk, and how to work together with other abuse desks http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/7/44/33696482.pdf for example. That would be of far more value actually.