Re: Moving forward ...

Craig Hughes wrote:

> But it'd still be nice to have some kind of way for SUPERIDS to signal 
> to VICTIM (or downstream filters/MUAs/users) that something had happened.
>
> C 


Besides altering the VERP and throwing in a header line?

The advantage, over simpy having SUPERIDS speak SMTP in both directions,
 of creating this benevolent MITM, is that we no longer have to
muck with debugging a consent specification language and our users can write
weak SMTP daemons without endangering the enterprise?

-- 
[email protected].
Include phrase "cat and buttered toast" to get through my filter