Uses of incoming data ...
"Jesse Dougherty" <[email protected]> Mon, 9 Feb 2004 08:49:34 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.asrg.filtering |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
IMHO, There are really two questions to answer when trying to define headers added to messages to indicate the results of filtering: 1) what information is useful and to whom? 2) what format is useful and how will it be consumed? My quick thoughts on #1 ... The incoming email filtered at a gateway/proxy (SMTP or POP time). The message is then available to a client or workgroup server, where a message disposition decision is made. Please Note: The information required by an administrator of a workgroup server may be different than those of the recipient (as the admin of the server may have to enforce some local policies regarding content, privacy, etc). Definitions of spam aren't consistent (initiate 1 year email list argument here!). Different applications implement: 1) unwanted email (ex: bayes systems trained by individuals/groups) 2) UCBE or some combination thereof (ex: heuristic systems trained on honeypots) 3) Email Hygiene (same as #2 but cleaned of porn, scams, and other nasties) (Please extend the above if you have more insight). Questions: Should we consider a more granular / extensible header spec? -- Jesse Dougherty Director of Development, Sophos Email: [email protected] Direct: 604 484 6434 Web: www.sophos.com Sophos - protecting businesses against viruses and spam