Re: Realisticness of header rearrangement

> 
> The obvious issue with it is, as you point out, that filters must
> either say "spam" or say nothing. I'd extend this a bit and say that
> filters also aren't allowed to indicate degrees of spamminess.

I disagree there nor do I see a reason for it.  options are good;
limiting options are bad.  Let's not limit filters to doing only
the things you or I want them to do right now.  

mm