Re: Realisticness of header rearrangement
david nicol <[email protected]> 08 Apr 2004 18:53:32 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.asrg.filtering |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
What if we declared an extension to Received: header syntax? Instead of a new header, we would define some parseable pairs that go inside a Received header. On Mon, 2004-04-05 at 17:49, Philip Miller wrote: > > If someone comes up with a more aesthetically pleasing way to match tag to > Received header, with similar or better functional characteristics than the > Received-timestamp, I'm all ears. > > Philip Miller -- david nicol this message was sent from a filtering e-mail address. Until I add you to my friends list, to get by Big Emet the cowboy doorman your reply must include a listed "magic phrase" such as "cat and buttered toast"