Re: Realisticness of header rearrangement
David Nicol <[email protected]> Mon, 12 Apr 2004 13:37:11 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.asrg.filtering |
|---|---|
| Organization | tipjar LLC |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Mark E. Mallett wrote: > > - trace headers are only for exposition to the curious; > - fixed headers are for productive use. > > mm which would mean Tagged: would be open to rewriting by the last tagger in the path to you, and it would be reasonable to expect a single Tagged: header. No rewriting current MUAs that can look at arbitrary named headers wil be required. That works for me, for debugging and the curious taggers can be rewritten in vendor-specific ways, the standard can suggest a format, such as X-Vendor-Old-Tagged: when you clobber a preexisting tagged: header. -- [email protected]. I know you, junk mail. Gonna miss you when you're gone