Re: Summary of interests ..
"Terry Sullivan" <[email protected]> Thu, 19 Feb 2004 14:44:01 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.asrg.filtering |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 12:19:37 -0800, Jesse Dougherty wrote: >1) communicating filtering decisions made at the MTA to the MUA >2) providing feedback on errors/preference from the MUA to the MTA >3) communicating filtering data between MTAs and/or MUAs (innoculation) > >Please add to this list if you feel there are other interactions we >should be considering ... These could be rephrased as "upstream," downstream," and "P2P." I guess I just have some tiny intuitive niggle that says it's better not to constrain our thinking about the sender/receiver to email widgets, even if that's the primary venue. >Anyone have any feedback on this approach? It rocks! :-) (And I agree with your assessment that we need more input/expertise from folks on the "upstream" side of things.)