Re: Moving forward ...
"Jesse Dougherty" <[email protected]> Thu, 26 Feb 2004 11:52:20 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.asrg.filtering |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[snip] > > There are two possible outcomes from this, since one > presumably wants virus scanning to occur before the MUA gets > its mitts on it: > > 1. You can't train spam filters on viruses/worms/etc. The > probable corollary is that it's going to be a given that > virus/worm content should be removed from the mail stream > when detected. It shouldn't even get to the spam filter. > > 2. Spam and malware filtering must happen at the same time, > before the user has the opportunity to be stupid. Once again, > viruses, etc., must be removed from the mail system before > delivery, regardless of spam tagging/processing. I see the message filtering happening in 3 phases (not all networks will have all 3 levels). Forgive the alliteration, I sometimes have to deal directly with our marketing groups :) 1) Protection - MTA/MDA - implemented by administrator - malware - UCE/spam filtering 2) Policy - enforce communications policies (MTA or MDA) - content policy - archiving - ... 3) Preference (MDA or MUA) - personal rules - personal bayes filtering Each level may remove items from the mail stream, or add data to the messages for consumption later down the line. > > Karl B. > Drexel University Postmaster >